粘弹性流体注入潜航体边界层湍流减阻数值模拟研究

Numerical simulation of turbulent drag reduction in boundary layer of submarine vehicle with viscoelastic fluid injection

  • 摘要: 【目的】通过探讨粘弹性流体注入边界层对潜航体湍流减阻效果及流场结构演化的影响,为水下航行体高效减阻技术提供新思路。【方法】基于SUBOFF潜艇全附体几何模型,采用大涡模拟(LES)结合动态亚格子应力模型,模拟分析粘弹性流体主要流变学参数(松弛时间λ=0.01~0.1)和来流速度(1~4 kn)对潜航体阻力特性、流场结构及粘弹性流体浓度扩散行为的影响。【结果】粘弹性流体在航速达到2 kn以上时显著降低摩擦阻力,最大减阻率达33.47%(λ=0.01,4 kn),总阻力减阻率最高达29.89%(λ=0.1,4 kn)。低速时(1 kn)粘弹性流体形成稳定附体层,中高速(3~4 kn)近壁面流场趋于紊乱,指挥台后方出现涡结构;松弛时间增大(λ=0.1)可抑制低速涡旋强度,但航速增加时影响减弱。低航速下浓度扩散均匀,当航速大于3 kn节时扩散范围受限;松弛时间延长(λ=0.1)增强低速扩散能力。【结论】粘弹性流体注入边界层在高速工况下展现出主动减阻潜力,减少了潜航体摩擦阻力,但需通过松弛时间与航速协同优化抑制压差阻力增量。

     

    Abstract: Objectives To investigate the influence of viscoelastic fluid injection on turbulence drag reduction and flow structure evolution in submersible vehicle boundary layers, providing new ideas for efficient drag reduction technologies in underwater vehicles. Methods Based on the SUBOFF submarine full-appendage geometric model, large eddy simulation (LES) combined with the dynamic sub-grid stress model was used to simulate and analyze the effects of the main rheological parameters of viscoelastic fluid (relaxation time λ = 0.01~0.1) and the incoming flow velocity (1~4 kn) on the drag characteristics, flow field structure and concentration diffusion behavior of viscoelastic fluid of the underwater vehicle. . Grid independence verification (11.58 million cells) and experimental validation (LES error <5%) ensured method reliability. Results Viscoelastic fluid significantly reduced friction drag when the inflow velocity reached ≥2 kn, achieving a maximum drag reduction rate of 33.47% (λ=0.01, 4 kn) and a total drag reduction rate of up to 29.89% (λ=0.1, 4 kn). At low speeds (1 kn), viscoelastic fluid formed a stable boundary layer attachment, while medium-high speeds (3–4 kn) induced turbulent vortices near the wall (e.g., Kármán streets behind the conning tower); increasing relaxation time (λ=0.1) suppressed low-speed vortex intensity but weakened its effect at higher speeds. At low speeds, concentration diffusion remained uniform, whereas diffusion range became restricted at speeds >3 kn; extending relaxation time (λ=0.1) enhanced low-speed diffusion capacity. Conclusions Viscoelastic fluid injection demonstrates active drag reduction potential at high speeds by reducing friction drag. However, coordinated optimization of relaxation time and inflow velocity is required to suppress pressure drag increments.

     

/

返回文章
返回