基于ALE方法的自升式平台抗倾覆稳性校核方法研究

Study on the checking method for anti-capsizing stability of Jack-up platforms using ALE Method

  • 摘要:
    目的 针对独立桩腿式自升式平台抗倾覆稳性校核中非线性分析计算成本高、规范方法精度不足的问题,并完善相关校核体系,为工程设计提供精准高效的计算方法。
    方法 以无桩靴自升式平台为研究对象,基于 拉格朗日–欧拉方法(ALE)建立土壤−桩腿有限元模型,通过在桩腿顶端施加弯矩模拟倾覆力矩,分析桩腿整体位移、旋转角度及旋转中心距泥面相对距离的变化规律;改变插桩深度(8~15 m)和土壤参数验证规律通用性,结合实际平台实例,对比所提方法、中国船级社规范方法与非线性管土分析的所得结果。
    结果 研究明确了桩腿运动呈现 “整体平动 + 绕旋转中心转动” 特征。结果表明,倾覆过程中旋转中心距泥面相对垂直距离的离散程度小,可近似为恒定;所提方法的计算结果相比规范方法,其相对误差降低了约 10%,更接近于非线性分析准确值。
    结论 所提方法兼顾了计算精度与效率,力臂铰接点选取标准(无桩靴平台可采用 60% 插桩深度处)合理,可为自升式平台抗倾覆稳性校核提供可靠工程参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  This study addresses the challenges associated with high computational cost in nonlinear analysis and the insufficient accuracy of code-based methods for the anti-capsizing stability check of Jack-up platforms with independent spud legs. The aim is to enhance the existing verification system and provide an accurate, efficient calculation method for engineering design.
    Methods Taking a Jack-up platform without a spudcan as the research object, a finite element model of the soil-spud leg was developed using the Arbitrary Lagrangian−Eulerian (ALE) method. The capsizing moment was simulated by applying a bending moment at the top of the spud leg. The variation in spud leg displacement, rotation angle, and the relative vertical distance from the rotation center to the mud surface were analyzed. The generality of the laws was verified by varying the spud penetration depth (8 m−15 m) and soil parameters. The results of the proposed method, the China Classification Society (CCS) code method, and the nonlinear pipe-soil analysis were compared, using an actual platform case for validation.
    Results It is confirmed that the motion of the spud leg is characterized by "overall translation + rotation around the rotation center". During the capsizing process, the relative vertical distance from the rotation center to the mud surface has small dispersion and can be considered approximately constant. Compared with the CCS code method, the relative error of the proposed method is reduced by approximately 10%, bringing the results closer to the accurate values obtained from the nonlinear pipe-soil analysis.
    Conclusions The proposed method balances computational accuracy and efficiency, and the proposed selection standard for the moment arm hinge point (60% of the spud penetration depth can be adopted for platforms without a spudcan) is reasonable. It can provide a reliable engineering reference for the anti-capsizing stability assessment of Jack-up platforms.

     

/

返回文章
返回