基于RHC-TVLQG-AR算法的舰载机着舰控制

Carrier-based aircraft landing control using the RHC-TVLQG-AR algorithm

  • 摘要:
    目的 为实现复杂海况和舰尾流干扰条件下的精确着舰控制,提出一种RHC-TVLQG-AR算法。
    方法 根据滚动时域控制的思想,将着舰控制问题转化为滚动时域内的跟踪控制问题。在每一个时间窗口内,基于自回归模型对理想着舰点运动进行在线精确预估,并将理想着舰点的预估运动信号加入舰载机在当前时间窗口内的导引律中,然后以求解的控制序列中第一个时间步的控制信号作为舰载机的控制输入,从而得到舰载机在下一个时间步的状态。接着将时间窗口向后移动一个时间步,更新初始状态后,采用上一个时间窗口中的方法对当前时间窗口内的跟踪控制问题进行再次求解。通过时间窗口的一步步后移,最终实现对舰载机的精确着舰控制。
    结果 根据舰载机在不同初始条件和不同海况下的着舰仿真结果可知,该算法下触舰点与理想着舰点的偏差在3.57 m以内,比线性二次高斯(LQG)方法具有更高的跟踪精度、更快的跟踪速度和更好的灵活性。
    结论 该算法可在复杂海况下实现满足输入约束的精确着舰控制。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To achieve precise landing control under complex sea conditions and ship wake interference, this study proposes an RHC-TVLQG-AR algorithm (receding horizon control-time varying linear quadratic Gaussian-autoregressive model).
    Method Based on the concept of receding horizon control (RHC), the landing control problem is transformed into a tracking control problem within the receding horizon. At each time step, an autoregressive model is used to accurately predict the trajectory of the desired landing point online. This predicted trajectory of the ideal landing point is then incorporated into the guidance law of the carrier-based aircraft during the current time window. Then, the control signal corresponding to the first time step of the solved control sequence is applied as the control input to the carrier-based aircraft, thereby updating its state to the next time step. The time window shifts backward by one step, and the initial state is updated accordingly. The tracking control problem in the current time window is then solved using the same procedure as in the previous time window. By iteratively shifting the time window backward, precise landing control of the carrier-based aircraft is finally achieved in a step-by-step manner.
    Results According to the landing simulation results for the carrier-based aircraft under various initial and sea conditions, the deviation between the touchdown point and the ideal landing point using the proposed algorithm remains within 3.57 m. Compared to the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) method, this approach achieves higher tracking accuracy, faster tracking speed and better flexibility.
    Conclusion The algorithm can realize precise landing control while satisfying input constraints under complex sea conditions.

     

/

返回文章
返回