FirmandhaTopan, YudiOktoviantoMuhammad, AnggaraSony. 基于咬合法和叶片损失法的艉轴架强度评估[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2019, 14(S2): 47-53. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01483
引用本文: FirmandhaTopan, YudiOktoviantoMuhammad, AnggaraSony. 基于咬合法和叶片损失法的艉轴架强度评估[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2019, 14(S2): 47-53. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01483
Firmandha Topan, Yudi Oktovianto Muhammad, Anggara Sony. Shaft bracket strength assessment based on seizing and blade loss methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2019, 14(S2): 47-53. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01483
Citation: Firmandha Topan, Yudi Oktovianto Muhammad, Anggara Sony. Shaft bracket strength assessment based on seizing and blade loss methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2019, 14(S2): 47-53. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01483

基于咬合法和叶片损失法的艉轴架强度评估

Shaft bracket strength assessment based on seizing and blade loss methods

  • 摘要:
      目的  虽然各船级社已针对艉轴架尺寸(如厚度和截面积)发布了最低要求,但在实际应用中,不同船级社对艉轴架尺寸的最低要求不同。在为需要转级的新船舶或现有船舶制定强度标准时,需要进一步研究并确定艉轴架的最低尺寸要求。
      方法  以7艘注册为A级的船舶模型为样本,参考了8个船级社的规范(A级至H级)中与船体结构安全有关的要求,首先采用咬合法和叶片损失法推导了规范中艉轴架的计算公式,验证了2种方法的可行性。然后采用这2种方法对Ⅰ型单艉轴架(Ⅰ-strut)和Ⅴ型双艉轴架(Ⅴ-strut)进行建模,确定最低尺寸要求。
      结果  结果表明,船级社在载荷条件、边界条件、形状、截面面积、轴架长度、许用应力等方面均有一定的假设。
      结论  研究成果可为设计人员制定艉轴架强度安全限值提供参考。

     

    Abstract:
      Objectives  Classification societies have issued minimum requirements regarding dimensions of shaft bracket, e.g. thickness and cross-section area. However, in practice, the varying requirements of each classification society provide different levels of safety. This is an important issue for designers in determining strength standards for new buildings or existing ships which are intended to undergo a transfer of class. Hence, further study is required to establish the actual minimum requirements.
      Methods  In this study, seven ship models registered in Class A are used as samples to compare the requirements of eight classification societies, labelled Classes A to H in the following discussion. Firstly, the seizing and blade loss methods are adopted to devive the formula of shaft bracket in rules, and their feasibility is proved. Then, the Ⅰ-strut and Ⅴ-strut shaft bracket are modelled by the two methods to determine the actual minimum size requirements.
      Results  The results show that there is a number of assumptions that were used by the classification societies regarding the loading conditions, boundary conditions, shape, cross-section area and bracket length, as well as allowable stress.
      Conclusions  This study will provide designers with useful references for setting safety limits for shaft bracket strength.

     

/

返回文章
返回