Numerical solution and sensitivity analysis of hydrodynamic force derivatives on maneuverability prediction

SUN Hanbing; XIAO Jiafeng; WANG Wei; LIU Weijie; ZHENG Xing

doi:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02243

Volume 17 Issue 1

Mar. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Ship Research > 2022 > 17(1): 60-70

SUN H B, XIAO J F, WANG W, et al. Numerical solution and sensitivity analysis of hydrodynamic force derivatives on maneuverability prediction[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(1): 60–70 doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02243

Citation:

PDF( 2389 KB)

Numerical solution and sensitivity analysis of hydrodynamic force derivatives on maneuverability prediction

doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02243

SUN Hanbing^1
,,
XIAO Jiafeng^1
,,
WANG Wei^2
,,
LIU Weijie¹,
ZHENG Xing^{1
,
,}

1.
College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
2.
China State Shipbuilding Corporation Systems Engineering Research Institute, Beijing 100036, China

Received Date: 2020-12-30
Accepted Date: 2022-01-28
Rev Recd Date: 2021-03-23

Available Online: 2022-01-28

Publish Date: 2022-03-02

Abstract

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objectives Aiming at balancing the cost and accuracy of ship maneuvering motion prediction, a numerical calculation based prediction approach is presented, combined with the sensitivity analysis of hydrodynamic derivatives. Methods First, the numerical calculation is carried out by solving the RANS equations, employing the method of volume-of-fluid (VOF) to capture the free-water surface and putting constraints on the motion of DTMB 5415 model, additional comparison of the linear hydrodynamic derivatives obtained from the regression are conducted with the experimental data so as to verify the validity of the proposed numerical scheme. Furthermore, a ship maneuvering mathematical model of DTMB 5415 is established on the basis of the maneuvering mathematical model group (MMG) method, and the Runge-Kutta algorithm is utilized to solve the equations and the model's turning and zigzag maneuvering motions are simulated. Finally, the sensitivity of the hydrodynamic derivatives of the two maneuvering motions are analyzed. Results The results show that the modelling results of ship motion trajectory and parameter for criteria obtained by the proposed methods are agree well with the experimental data, among which the average errors of the parameters of turning and zigzag maneuvering motion are 5.1% and 11.7% respectively. Compared with the results of the self-propelled ship model simulation using CFD, both the accuracy and cost are improved. The sensitivity analysis also verify that some nonlinear hydrodynamic derivatives have little influence on the maneuverability criterion, and can be estimated using empirical formulas. Conclusions The proposed method is feasible for ship maneuverability motions prediction, which can meet the engineering application precision and reduce the calculation cost greatly, especially suitable for the maneuverability motions prediction and optimization in ship design stage.
- ship maneuverability,
- maneuvering motion prediction,
- hydrodynamic derivatives,
- sensitivity analysis,
- numeral calculation

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	苏兴翘, 高士奇, 黄衍顺. 船舶操纵性[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1989. SU X Q, GAO S Q, HUANG Y S. Ship maneuverability[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1989 (in Chinese).
[2]	IMO. Standards for ship manoeuvrability: MSC. 137(76)[S]. London, UK: IMO, 2002.
[3]	IMO. Explanatory notes to the standards for ship manoeuvrability: MSC/Circ. 1053[S]. London, UK: IMO, 2002.
[4]	ITTC. Final report and recommendations to the 25th ITTC[C]//Proceedings of the 25th International Towing Tank Conference. Fukuoka, Japan: ITTC, 2008.
[5]	CARRICA P M, ISMAIL F, HYMAN M, et al. Turn and zigzag maneuvers of a surface combatant using a URANS approach with dynamic overset grids[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2013, 18(2): 166–181. doi: 10.1007/s00773-012-0196-8
[6]	WANG J H, ZHAO W W, WAN D C. Free maneuvering simulation of ONR Tumblehome using overset grid method in naoe-FOAM-SJTU solver[C]//Proceedings of the 31th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Monterey, USA: [s.n.] 2016.
[7]	MOFIDI A, MARTIN E J, CARRICA M P. Propeller/rudder interaction with direct and coupled CFD/potential flow propeller approaches, and application to a zigzag manoeuvre[J]. Ship Technology Research, 2018, 65(1): 10–31. doi: 10.1080/09377255.2017.1399970
[8]	JIN Y T, DUFFY J, CHAI S H, et al. DTMB 5415M dynamic manoeuvres with URANS computation using body-force and discretised propeller models[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 182: 305–317. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.036
[9]	KIM H, AKIMOTO H, ISLAM H. Estimation of the hydrodynamic derivatives by RANS simulation of planar motion mechanism test[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 108: 129–139. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.010
[10]	SAKAMOTO N, CARRICA P M, STERN F. URANS simulations of static and dynamic maneuvering for surface combatant: part 1. verification and validation for forces, moment, and hydrodynamic derivatives[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2012, 17(4): 422–445. doi: 10.1007/s00773-012-0178-x
[11]	ROY-CHOUDHURY S, DASH A K, NAGARAJAN V, et al. CFD simulations of steady drift and yaw motions in deep and shallow water[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 142: 161–184. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.06.058
[12]	程捷, 张志国, 蒋奉兼, 等. 平面运动机构试验的数值模拟[J]. 水动力学研究与进展 (A辑), 2013, 28(4): 460–464. CHENG J, ZHANG Z G, JIANG F J, et al. Numerical simulation of the planar motion mechanism tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics (Ser. A), 2013, 28(4): 460–464 (in Chinese).
[13]	李冬琴, 徐士友, 刘存杰. 船舶低频纯横荡及纯首摇运动数值仿真与分析[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2016, 38(9): 9–13. LI D Q, XU S Y, LIU C J. Ship low-frequency pure sway and pure yaw motion numerical simulation and analysis[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2016, 38(9): 9–13 (in Chinese).
[14]	王建华, 万德成. 基于重叠网格技术数值模拟船舶纯摇首运动[J]. 水动力学研究与进展 (A辑), 2016, 31(5): 567–574. WANG J H, WAN D C. Numerical simulation of pure yaw motion using dynamic overset grid technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics (Ser. A), 2016, 31(5): 567–574 (in Chinese).
[15]	CURA-HOCHBAUM A. On the numerical prediction of the ship's manoeuvring behavior[J]. Ship Science & Technology, 2011, 5(9): 27–39.
[16]	GUO H P, ZOU Z J. System-based investigation on 4-DOF ship maneuvering with hydrodynamic derivatives determined by RANS simulation of captive model tests[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2017, 68: 11–25. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2017.08.006
[17]	HAJIVAND A, MOUSAVIZADEGAN S H. Virtual simulation of maneuvering captive tests for a surface vessel[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2015, 7(5): 848–872. doi: 10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0060
[18]	SUKAS O F, KINACI O K, BAL S. System-based prediction of maneuvering performance of twin-propeller and twin-rudder ship using a modular mathematical model[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2019, 84: 145–162. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2019.01.008
[19]	刘厚文. 船舶操纵性仿真与舵鳍联合控制方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2013. LIU H W. Simulation of ship maneuvering and study of rudder/fin roll stabilization control[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2013 (in Chinese).
[20]	LYSTER C A, KNIGHTS H L. Prediction equations for ships' turning circles[J]. North East Coast Institution of Engineers & Shipbuilders, 1979, 95(4): 217–222.