Quantitative analysis method for ship construction quality

FU Senzong; WANG Hongdong; YI Hong

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.02.019

Volume 12 Issue 2

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Ship Research > 2017 > 12(2): 143-150

FU Senzong, WANG Hongdong, YI Hong. Quantitative analysis method for ship construction quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2017, 12(2): 143-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.02.019

Citation:

FU Senzong, WANG Hongdong, YI Hong. Quantitative analysis method for ship construction quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2017, 12(2): 143-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.02.019

Citation:

FU Senzong, WANG Hongdong, YI Hong. Quantitative analysis method for ship construction quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2017, 12(2): 143-150. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.02.019

PDF( 1389 KB)

Quantitative analysis method for ship construction quality

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.02.019

FU Senzong¹,
WANG Hongdong^{2, 3
,},
YI Hong^{2, 3}

1.
Shanghai Military Representative Department, Naval Armament Department of PLAN, Shanghai 201206, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
3.
Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration, Shanghai 200240, China

Received Date: 2016-08-22
Available Online: 2017-03-13
Publish Date: 2017-04-01

Abstract

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The excellent performance of a ship is assured by the accurate evaluation of its construction quality. For a long time, research into the construction quality of ships has mainly focused on qualitative analysis due to a shortage of process data, which results from limited samples, varied process types and non-standardized processes. Aiming at predicting and controlling the influence of the construction process on the construction quality of ships, this article proposes a reliability quantitative analysis flow path for the ship construction process and fuzzy calculation method. Based on the process-quality factor model proposed by the Function-Oriented Quality Control (FOQC) method, we combine fuzzy mathematics with the expert grading method to deduce formulations calculating the fuzzy process reliability of the ordinal connection model, series connection model and mixed connection model. The quantitative analysis method is applied in analyzing the process reliability of a ship's shaft gear box installation, which proves the applicability and effectiveness of the method. The analysis results can be a useful reference for setting key quality inspection points and optimizing key processes.
- ship reliability,
- ship quality assessment,
- quantitative evaluation,
- process reliability,
- fuzzy cal-culation

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	BOSACCHI B. Fuzzy logic application to quality and reliability in microelectronics[C]//Proceedings of the SPIE2761, Applications of Fuzzy Logic Technology Ⅲ. Orlando, FL:SPIE, 1996.
[2]	周思醒, 杨建军, 胡涛.舰船总体任务可靠性建模新方法[J].中国舰船研究, 2010, 5(1):52-55. http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract526.shtml ZHOU S X, YANG J J, HU T. A new method to estab-lish reliability model for overall mission of ships[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2010, 5(1):52-55(in Chinese). http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract526.shtml
[3]	廖卫献, 门德春.核燃料包装容器桶体缝焊工艺可靠性建模[J].核动力工程, 1997, 18(6):563-564, 576. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDLG706.016.htm LIAO W X, MEN D C. Modelling of reliability of seam welding process of nuclear fuel containers[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 1997, 18(6):563-564, 576(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HDLG706.016.htm
[4]	BRALL A. Availability modeling for the application of manufacturing equipment[C]//Proceedings of the An-nual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.[S.l.]:IEEE, 2002.
[5]	JIANG Z B, ZUOM J, FUNG R Y K. Stochastic ob-ject-oriented Petri nets (SOPNs) for reliability model-ing of manufacturing systems[C]//Proceedings of theI-EEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.[S.l.]:IEEE, 1999.
[6]	ZHOU M C. Modeling, analysis, simulation, schedul-ing, and control of semiconductor manufacturing sys-tems:a Petri net approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 1998, 11(3):333-357. doi: 10.1109/66.705370
[7]	LIANG L, GUO B. The study of mission reliability of QRMS based on the multistage Markov Process[C]//Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Compu-tational Science:Part Ⅳ. Beijing, China:[s.n.], 2007.
[8]	MOCKO G M, PAASCH R. Incorporating uncertainty in diagnostic analysis of mechanical systems[J]. Jour-nal of Mechanical Design, 2005, 127(2):315-325. doi: 10.1115/1.1829071
[9]	蒋平. 机械制造的工艺可靠性研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2010.
[10]	王晓亮, 王大钧. 舰船建造过程可靠性工作系统的建立与实施[C]//第三届中国质量学术论坛论文集. 厦门: 中国质量协会, 2008.
[11]	张志英, 戴银芳, 陈杰.船底分段装配偏差流建模[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2012, 33(1):1-8. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBG201201002.htm ZHANG Z Y, DAI Y F, CHEN J. Modeling steam of variation for the bottom block assembly[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2012, 33(1):1-8(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HEBG201201002.htm
[12]	周宏, 蒋志勇.舰船制造可靠性评价指标体系及方法研究[J].舰船科学技术, 2005, 27(5):87-90. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCKX200505020.htm ZHOU H, JIANG Z Y. Study of the assess system and way of warship manufacture reliability[J]. Ship Sci-ence and Technology, 2005, 27(5):87-90(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCKX200505020.htm
[13]	黄一民.舰船建造工艺失效模式及影响分析方法简介[J].船舶, 2005(6):35-38. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CBZZ200506008.htm HUANG Y M. Methods of failure mode and affect analysis for shipbuilding techniques[J]. Ship & Boat, 2005(6):35-38(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CBZZ200506008.htm
[14]	杜振华, 杨芙云.电气装配可靠性工艺研究[J].舰船科学技术, 2006, 28(增刊1):69-72. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCKX2006S1022.htm DU Z H, YANG F Y. Electric assembly reliability technique research[J]. Ship Science and Technolo-gy, 2006, 28(Supp 1):69-72(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JCKX2006S1022.htm
[15]	王鸿东, 梁晓锋, 余平, 等.以功能为导向的舰船建造质量控制方法[J].中国舰船研究, 2016, 11(5):134-142. http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract1611.shtml WANG H D, LIANG X F, YU P, et al. A func-tion-oriented quality control method for ship construc-tion[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2016, 11(5):134-142(in Chinese). http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract1611.shtml
[16]	JOHNSON K G, KHAN M K. A study into the use of the process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA) in the automotive industry in the UK[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, 139(1/2/3):348-356. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222146802_A_study_into_the_use_of_the_process_failure_mode_and_effects_analysis_PFMEA_in_the_automotive_industry_in_the_UK
[17]	许卫宝.飞行员着舰的多层次模糊综合评价方法[J].中国舰船研究, 2013, 8(2):17-21. http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract859.shtml XU W B. A comprehensive evaluation method for car-rier landing based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy pro-cess[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2013, 8(2):17-21(in Chinese). http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract859.shtml
[18]	HIPEL K W, RADFORD K J, FANG L. Multiple par-ticipant-multiple criteria decision making[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1993, 23(4):1184-1189. doi: 10.1109/21.247900
[19]	BOWLES J B, PELÁEZ C E. Fuzzy logic prioritiza-tion of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering & Sys-tem Safety, 1995, 50(2):203-213. https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.elsevier-135f937d-7d45-367b-9a53-a8c3fe73114e
[20]	LIU P D. A weighted aggregation operators multi-at-tribute group decision-making method based on inter-val-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers[J]. Expert Sys-tems with Applications, 2011, 38(1):1053-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.144
[21]	白春杰, 吴晓平, 黄登斌.基于专家权重的综合评价研究[J].海军工程大学学报, 2004, 16(3):105-109. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJGX200403024.htm BAI C J, WU X P, HUANG D B. Improved AHP al-gorithm based on expert weights[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2004, 16(3):105-109(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJGX200403024.htm
[22]	CHEN S J, CHEN S M. Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2003, 11(1):45-56. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2002.806316
[23]	文成林, 周哲, 徐晓滨.一种新的广义梯形模糊数相似性度量方法及在故障诊断中的应用[J].电子学报, 2011, 39(3A):1-6. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXU2011S1001.htm WEN C L, ZHOU Z, XU X B. A new similarity mea-sure between generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its application to fault diagnosis[J]. Acta Elec-tronica Sinica, 2011, 39(3A):1-6(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXU2011S1001.htm